Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lesya Tsurenko vs Jasmine Paolini Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tsurenko vs Paolini analysis and find out who is favored!
Lesya Tsurenko vs Jasmine Paolini Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tsurenko 0 - 1 Paolini
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tsurenko has won 41.73% of points on his second serve, while Paolini has won 47.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tsurenko, in recent form, has won 62.17% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paolini has won 56.62%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.39% and 40.61% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tsurenko has saved 51.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paolini has saved 54.59% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tsurenko has won 58.14% of matches played (W/L 25/ 18), with Paolini winning 63.01% (W/L 46/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tsurenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 67/ 35), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 40/ 31). Paolini has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 205/ 122), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 6/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Tsurenko has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 53.33% of matches (W/L 8/ 7), where as Paolini has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tsurenko winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tsurenko winning 1 and Paolini winning 2. The last match between Tsurenko and Paolini was at the Jasmin Open Tunisia - Monastir, 21-10-2023, Semifinals, Hard with Jasmine Paolini getting the victory 6-2 4-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:25:27.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tsurenko and Paolini have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tsurenko winning 0 times and Paolini 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tsurenko winning 0, and Paolini 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tsurenko has played against opponents with an average rank of 150.4 while Paolini has played against players with an average rank of 124.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tsurenko has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paolini has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tsurenko has converted 45.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paolini has converted 54.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
44
Rank
23
High
34
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
13
Rank
12
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
60% (480-322)
Career Total W/L
58% (371-267)
47% (9-10)
YTD W/L
62% (16-10)
$4,668,994
Career Prize Money
$2,230,226
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lesya Tsurenko | Jasmine Paolini |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 10 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:25:27 | 2:25:27 |
| 1st Serve % | 78% (73/94) | 63% (66/105) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 49% (36/73) | 61% (40/66) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 33% (7/21) | 46% (18/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 21% (5/24) | 47% (8/17) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (47/105) | 54% (51/94) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Lesya Tsurenko
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
78%
(
73 of
94)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
45%
(
47 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
51 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lesya Tsurenko | Jasmine Paolini |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (9/10) | 62% (16/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (22/23) | 62% (37/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (193/203) | 54% (311/264) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 67% (12/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 57% (4/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 3 | 34 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 80 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:38:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 141.32 | 144.31 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (866/1271) | 70% (1261/1813) |
| 1st Serve W% | 56% (484/866) | 62% (787/1261) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (169/405) | 47% (262/552) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (87/193) | 54% (114/210) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (651/1370) | 46% (857/1863) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 56% (5/4) | 67% (10/5) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 20% (1/4) | 43% (3/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (9/18) | 62% (16/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 60% (10/6) | 100% (14/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 40% (10/4) | 0% (14/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 17% (12/2) |
Lesya Tsurenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Lesya Tsurenko
38%
(
3 of
8)
1st Serve %
40%
(
2 of
5)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
2 of
3)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
9
Total Points Won
4
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lesya Tsurenko
Player
Donna Vekic
72%
(
79 of
110)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
103)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
43 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
107
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandra Eala
Player
Lesya Tsurenko
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
74%
(
74 of
100)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
28%
(
9 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
51%
(
44 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Lesya Tsurenko
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
48%
(
49 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Lesya Tsurenko
Player
Ana Bogdan
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
74%
(
60 of
81)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
67%
(
10 of
15)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
53%
(
32 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
50 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Astra Sharma
Player
Lesya Tsurenko
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
80%
(
44 of
55)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Lesya Tsurenko
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
47 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lesya Tsurenko
Player
Magda Linette
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
21%
(
5 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
35)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
95
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Lesya Tsurenko
63%
(
67 of
107)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
101)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
8
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
28%
(
11 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
49%
(
52 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
101)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lesya Tsurenko
Player
Liv Hovde
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
52%
(
14 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
48%
(
21 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Jasmine Paolini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Jasmine Paolini
70%
(
79 of
113)
1st Serve %
73%
(
77 of
106)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
54 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
106)
110
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Jasmine Paolini
66%
(
56 of
85)
1st Serve %
77%
(
51 of
66)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Caroline Garcia
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Jasmine Paolini
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Ons Jabeur
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Sara Errani
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
68%
(
26 of
38)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Jasmine Paolini
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Katie Volynets
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
83%
(
69 of
83)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(8) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Jasmine Paolini
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tsurenko Vs Paolini Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
